Usability Quote of the Day

February 9, 2012

Most people who encounter computer-based automation at work do not choose the software with which they work, and have comparatively little control over when and how they do what they do. For them, the use of computers can be an oppressive experience, rather than a liberating one. -- Sarah Kuhn, Bringing Design to Software, edited by Terry Winograd, 1996    (via interaction-design.org)

Friday, February 25, 2005

Why Consistency is Critical

"There is often a tendency to do clever things with user interface elements -- frequently, with the best intentions -- that cause problems. For example, some sites execute an action when a user selects an option button (or radio button). This behavior can be very confusing if it is unexpected. Saving a single click at the expense of consistent behavior is probably not a good strategy.

The most basic requirement for consistency in UI elements is to apply them as they are originally defined. For example:

- Option buttons (radio buttons) only for mutually-exclusive items, so that the user can choose only one option
- Check boxes if the user can choose one or more options
- Avoid applying unnecessary graphical treatment that can confuse the user, making them user of the type of UI element they are using. Option buttons should be round, check - - boxes square. Editable fields should have white backgrounds; non-editable fields should be grey.

As an example, consider the Google 'advanced search' page, which contains text fields, push-buttons, drop-downs, option buttons, links and various other elements, all of which are clearly discernible for what they are."

User Interface Design - Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) - Ergonomics

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

<< Home
.